The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete--JForget 19:17, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki fever (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Looks like a dictionary entry for a term someone made up. Kww 21:54, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete WP:N, WP:OR (possibly,) WP:NOT#DICT OSborn^arf 21:57, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Non-notable neologism, and a dicdef to boot. Iain99^{Balderdash and piffle} 22:26, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Fails notability. • Lawrence Cohen 22:32, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong Delete wrong on so many levels, WP:NOT, WP:NOR, WP:N, Wikipedia is not for things made up in school one day, etc.... Rackabello 23:14, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Fails WP:NOT, etc. per above. It follows only one "WP:" abbreviation: WP:INTERESTING. szyslak 23:19, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Why is it that everybody wants to coin a word? The Wiki- variations are the least imaginative of all... I'm Wiki sicky about it. Mandsford 00:47, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, total neologism, totally unsourced, totally unnotable. But let's admit that we do this all the time. TheLetterM 02:06, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Original research and non-notable. — Wenli ^(contribs) 02:53, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment Why isn't this being speedily deleted?--Mostargue 09:57, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

CommentWhat category of speedy would you suggest?Kww 09:59, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment How about A7?--Mostargue 00:47, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Doesn't apply. This isn't "real person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content". Kww 01:04, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Oh well, I recommend Speedy Delete anyways. This is definitely a case of WP:IAR if I ever saw it.--Mostargue 06:06, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:OR. --Alksub 22:10, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.