The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Daniel Bryant 08:51, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wii Shooting (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Subject has not been shown to meet notability criteria. No reliable sources have been provided after nearly a month from being tagged. The only verifiable information is a rumor that has been spread mostly on gaming blogs and fansites. Most of the content in the article constitues original research, which fails Wikipedia:Attribution. Many web search results for "Wii Shooting" refer to the Duck Hunt-style shooting demo at E3 that was incorporated into Wii Play, and not a separate game. Dancter 00:42, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. Dancter 00:42, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong delete per WP:NOT#CRYSTAL; the article itself even admits that "it is unlikely the game exists." Krimpet 00:46, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - The first line says it is a "rumored Wii game." The article, likewise, should not yet be released. ◄Zahakiel► 00:50, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong delete, especially since the only citation in the article comes from a blog.--TBCΦtalk? 00:50, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Lol, it doesn't even exist. Come on, guys? Alex43223 ^{T | C | E} 00:54, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Crystal balling. Even if it was definitely in development, it still would not meet our notability criteria. Not every game is notable. --- RockMFR 01:10, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • I wouldn't agree with that, espeically since athletes who only compete in 1 game are considered notable. TJ Spyke 02:16, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Reliable source please? Original research and rumors in this article.--PrestonH^{(Review Me!) • (Sign Here!)} 01:46, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:NOT#CRYSTAL
• Delete since it is "unlikely to exist", obviously! — brighterorange (talk) 02:14, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong Delete The article itself states why, it's a RUMORED game (i.e. doesn't exist). TJ Spyke 02:16, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete No verifiable information. Maxamegalon2000 05:08, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - do I hear the sound of a snowball heating up? --Action Jackson IV 07:02, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Yelling Delete while throwing a snowball at Action Jackson. :-) Real96 11:32, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Article is failing WP:NOT#CRYSTAL and could be seen as just a myth, failing WP:V because of the lack of sources.Tellyaddict 18:59, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• We're not ready for this yet. Delete per nom. Until this game is announced, I think we should delete this. Bigtop 22:29, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, and we may as well call WP:SNOWBALL on this one as well. Snowball's chance in hell of passing this AfD. There's nothing to indicate Nintendo has released information about this game. That means it automatically fails WP:V, because there's no possible way to verify it's existence, even as a development product. Cheers, Lankybugger 13:10, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.