This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete and added to BJAODN. Woohookitty 16:17, 28 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

seems to me to be either a spoof, or so deeply obscure that it had better be scrapped and started again. seglea 23:18, 21 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, first of all the artice starts off with "probably". Seems like a hoax, the other articles created by the author have already been speedied. But beside that, no notability established in article. --TheMidnighters 23:27, 21 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• BJAODN. This is one of the funniest non-articles to come down the pike in a long time. Sneezelflump! - Lucky 6.9 23:30, 21 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. (or BJAODN). "The crime of selling one-sided paper..." -Willmcw 23:46, July 21, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete but BJAODN-worthy. Capitalistroadster 01:04, 22 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• BJAODN. JamesBurns 03:37, 23 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.