The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WjBscribe 02:48, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Westwood Tunnels (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

This is an unecyclopedic account apparently based on nothing more than student hearsay without published sources (perhaps added by those involved or their friends - it may be true, but Wikipedia rules insist that everything is supported by reputable published sources) and does not add anything useful to the section on the Westwood Tunnels in the main Warwick University entry, which summarises the main information in this article, but itself lacks sources. This article also fails the notability test. ThomasL 17:25, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete and bury in a catacomb per the nominator. Wikipedia is not for stories about your legend trip. - Smerdis of Tlön 19:26, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. It's more like a story about some vadding trips. Not really all that notable. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 20:23, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - It's highly believable that these tunnels exist, but not noteworthy. Mike1024 (t/c) 13:23, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.