The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) nableezy - 22:17, 27 November 2021 (UTC) 22:17, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Western Wall Tunnel riots (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Entirely unsourced article, with the only reference noted being the Hebrew Wikipedia. I have no idea if any of this is real or not, but as it stands if one removes all material lacking an inline citation per WP:V there is quite literally nothing left. Nableezy 20:01, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Seems unquestionably notable per WP:DIVERSE and WP:LASTING. It needs proper sourcing, but that's no reason to delete it. -- Bob drobbs (talk) 20:36, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Like I said, if one were to remove every sentence lacking an inline citation what is left is an empty article. Yes, not having a single source is a reason to delete it. Its been five years since this was created. Not a single source has been cited in that time. nableezy - 20:42, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, this article seems to have degraded severely in time, with an IP editor replacing the sourced version with an entirely unsourced account. Reverting and withdrawing. nableezy - 22:16, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.