The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Cirt (talk) 19:28, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WeDpro Inc.

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:ORG. the article lacks reliable third party sources. sections look copy and pasted. created by a single purpose editor. I could not find evidence of significant third party coverage. LibStar (talk) 08:33, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Doesn't meet the guidelines of WP:ORG. Many of these sources appear to originate from WeDpro's own web site or are documents written by Wedpro. There is also a deadlink to a blog-- woo. Looks like somebody needs some good old third-party coverage, but I wasn't able to find any. I, Jethrobot ^{drop me a line} 08:44, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:44, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as spam. The entire article is one big soapbox. -- Whpq (talk) 15:49, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.