The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 00:16, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WatchSite Nation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't seem to me as notable, but it might be notable so let an administrator choose. --Njavallil ...Talk 2 Me 20:19, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:37, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Looks like promotion to me, since Jacob Deschene is the founder and Deschenej is the article's creator. PaintedCarpet (talk) 09:30, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - No coverage in reliable sources. -- Whpq (talk) 17:21, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Non-notable promotional article. SL93 (talk) 18:38, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as not being covered in detail by multiple independent third party sources. If such sources are found and integrated into the article, feel free to ping my talk page. Stuartyeates (talk) 06:37, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.