The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Black Kite (t) (c) 23:37, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Washington Student Math Association

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article does not satisfy WP:NOTABILITY. Requesting deletion; only notable source which article cites is the Sammamish Review. All other references are towards the organisation's own website and the article reads like an advertisement. - ŞρІϊţ ۞ ĨήƒϊήίтҰ ^{(тąιк|соήтяївѕ)} 05:09, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Strong delete nothing in gnews [1]. LibStar (talk) 03:31, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LibStar (talk) 06:29, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:10, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Well-footnoted and well composed; adds information to Wikipedia on an esoteric topic. Not selling anybody anything. Not self-promoting gibberish by a bored HS student. An esoteric topic done right. No harm in inclusion, information will be lost by deletion. Easy call to keep. Carrite (talk) 17:08, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NOHARM should be avoided in deletion discussion. LibStar (talk) 04:47, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: A non-notable local organization.--RDBury (talk) 01:44, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.