The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep Hidy Ochiai and redirect Washin-Ryu Karate-Do .  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 04:49, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Washin-Ryu Karate-Do (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I Proded this as Not notable lack of independent sources (similar to a previous Prod) but both were contested. I still think it is a non-notable cluster of schools. Peter Rehse (talk) 19:02, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 19:02, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am also adding Hidy Ochiai for the same reasons - apparently he founded the style.Peter Rehse (talk) 20:16, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I found no reliable sources to show Mike Stone used this art (which he supposedly learned in the Army, although there's no indication it was ever taught there. Most of these sources deal with Ochiai and not the style.Mdtemp (talk) 17:20, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Those two articles, for example, were on the style itself. There are many articles on Ochiai, but there are also articles on the style, as well as his books on it. There are sites stating that Mike Stone did study Washin-ryu [6], [7], [8] but I haven't found a definitive source; other sites suggest Shorin-ryu. JJL (talk) 18:36, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I have added a list of magazines in which articles on Ochiai are prominent to his WP article. I also searched for Washin Ryu and found no mentions of it that didn't feature its founder. I don't believe either of these searches are complete, but they do seem to show their relative importance. Papaursa (talk) 23:11, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I have added the word "not" in the first sentence of the above comment since I believe it is in keeping with the author's context. If this is improper or incorrect please feel free to remove it. Papaursa (talk) 23:11, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.