The result was delete. Nobody has seriously contested or rebutted the argument that there are insufficient reliable sources for inclusion as an article. Sandstein 00:33, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The only sources are a.) a dead link to a press release, b.) a review that may or may not be reputable; c.) a podcast
Being published in book form is not an assertation of webcomic notability. Web Cartoonists' Choice Awards are not a sufficient assertation of notability; even though the second AFD kept this comic due to its winning this award, several WCCA winners in the past have been deleted. Likewise the Lulu awards; their page shows a huge amount of redlinks, suggesting that the award is not a paragon of notability.
In short, I'm seeing no reliable, secondary sources for this comic, nor could I find any. The second AFD argued entirely on the point of its award win, making no arguments either way as far as the sourcing issues. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 12:35, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]