The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Killiondude (talk) 02:57, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wallowing in Dhaka (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BOOKS. No awards, very little coverage in the media. Aftabuzzaman (talk) 02:35, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! ^{Babymissfortune} 03:56, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! ^{Babymissfortune} 03:57, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete not enough coverage to show notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 06:25, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Absolute dearth of peristent or in-depth coverage in independent reliable sources to indicate sufficient notability for maintaining here. >SerialNumber54129^{...speculates} 17:19, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedily Delete - Non notable article with less reliable sources. মাখামাখি (talk) 15:04, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.