The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Weak keep It's jargon-filled and technical, but I believe it's valid (I grew up around engineers who designed speakers, and this sounds a lot like their techno-babble). The article needs Wikification badly, though. --Dynaflow11:30, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I have attempted to Wikify it. This is my first post. Help would be appreciated. Thanks--JacquesPHI 12:19, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, WjBscribe23:31, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep I don't know where the nominator got the idea that this "reads like nonsense." Google either "Voight Pipe" or "Voigt Pipe" and you get plenty of examples. I'd suggest that the article either be expanded or redirected to Loudspeaker enclosure, which already has descriptions of TQWPs, also termed Voigt Pipe in that section of the article. But the nom doesn't make deletion for me. 74.134.59.45 03:46, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.