The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect to Recording studio. Cúchullain ^t/c 04:01, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vocal booth (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

It looks like it is promoting a product. My reason for believing this is because the creator's name is "vocalbooth" (I linked to his user talk since he has no userpage) and he has in the past added spam links to a website of a similar name ([1]). If "vocal booths" are more than some product that the creator is advertising then it may be a good idea to add appropriate references to show this. Also note that the creator has been indef blocked for a "promotional name" already. I thought this article could be speedy deleted but apparently not. Funpika 00:35, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• It looks like a generic term to me; however I doubt it should have its own article. So, I would say merge into Recording studio. --soum (0_o) 02:19, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• redirect to Recording studio - this is no more than an isolation booth, which is covered in its own subheading under Recording studio. AllGloryToTheHypnotoad 02:56, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• I agree: redirect to Recording studio. Doctormatt 23:36, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• redirect to Recording studio or Recording studio#Isolation booth if that is allowed. I'm not sure if the concept is broad enough such that a vocal booth or an isolation booth would ever warrant its own article. (Requestion 00:35, 12 May 2007 (UTC))[reply]
• Merge and redirect into Recording studio#Isolation booth; the concept is notable, the term is in common use, but they are the same thing. -- The Anome 16:18, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Recording studio due to being un-notable. It may also be worth noting that zero articles and only a few talk pages link to this page. --Kralizec! (talk) 17:18, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment being bold I changed this to a redirect. It seems to have removed the AfD template from showing up, though it is still there. Should it be removed before this is closed? Slavlin 17:26, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.