The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. I've reverted back to v.2010 to wipe out the promo crap, As noted below there is plenty of coverage. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010 • (talk) 19:11, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Visit Florida (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Obvious advert. Mr. Guye (talk) 01:23, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep and fix. The current tone of the article is more promotional than it should be, but that can be fixed: the 6 January 2010 version [1] was better, although it needed inline sources, and we might do well to go back to that version and try again. I think the topic itself—the public/private entity that replaced the former Department of Commerce and controls Florida tourism—is probably notable. Examples of coverage: [2] [3][4] [5] [6] --Arxiloxos (talk) 03:51, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - As pointed out above, this article meets WP:COMPANY (specifically, what's outlined here). As Arxiloxos points out, there are many independent sources that cover a variety of elements with this article. I would keep, and consider using the diff page to revert the article back to remove the WP:SOAP issues. ~Oshwah~ ^{(talk) (contribs)} 12:09, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.