The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 06:07, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Vickers Venture Partners (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This venture firm stub is not significant to be on Wikipedia. The sources has routine mentions of the company, and the general notability is missing here. Delete Assirian cat (talk) 11:41, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Singapore. Shellwood (talk) 11:46, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete agree with nom, press releases and the like. Oaktree b (talk) 20:12, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, most sources are WP:MILL. Ari T. Benchaim (talk) 00:55, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per users above. It's not even a matter for discussion. Just a weak under wiki stub --2603:6000:A500:25EF:9573:CA90:7D21:AC63 (talk) 21:07, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete not notable, no RS, no general notability shown. --Bigneeerman (talk) 21:49, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.