The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge. Wizardman 00:12, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vickers Type 40 mm AT/AA Gun[edit]

AfDs for this article:

Articles for deletion/Vickers Type 40 mm AT/AA Gun

No facts, dates, references, images - in fact nothing of any use

Note: This AfD and above the comment was originally posted by Rcbutcher on 16:46, 13 August 2008 (UTC). I have since created this sub-page (for correct formatting) and moved the original listing here. Thanks, Jamie^☆S93 17:58, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. —- Icewedge (talk) 18:55, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and redirect to (I think) Ordnance QF 2 pounder. Megapixie (talk) 02:06, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think the article is about a Japanese clone of the pom-pom (http://www.navweaps.com/Weapons/WNJAP_40mm-62_HI.htm). Bukvoed (talk) 18:02, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What do you think - make it a variant in the QF 2 pounder naval gun article ? Or keep it as its own article ? Megapixie (talk) 07:39, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'd merge it into QF 2 pounder naval gun as a variant. Bukvoed (talk) 14:02, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. —Fg2 (talk) 03:56, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Wizardman 02:27, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge This article might be salvageable via the references given at [1] Also found at p 21 of "Japanese Army of World War II" by Philip Warner, Michael Youens a statement that the Japanese used "40 mm Vickers machine cannon (water cooled, recoil operated, link-belt-fed automatic" and also used their own copies, although they were obsolescent. So merge to the main article on the weapon. Delete Fails verifiability. I doubt the Japanese official name for it was "Vickers" which was a British company The article title also calls it a "Type 40 mm" which seems to conflate the type designation and the calibre.. No referenced or useful information in the article. Edison (talk) 21:21, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into QF 2 pounder naval gun. There is unlikely to be enough material to justify its own page. Smile a While (talk) 19:30, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.