The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎. Doczilla _{Ohhhhhh, no!} 03:04, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Very Filmy

[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to fail WP:NTV and WP:GNG DonaldD23 talk to me 12:41, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Pakistan. DonaldD23 talk to me 12:41, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Wait, but why you actually said it passes WP:GNG earlier? And you removed the notability tags twice when I added them. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 12:51, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Opinions change. DonaldD23 talk to me 20:11, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Donaldd23, Sure, I just wanted to seek some clarification. Better late than never. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 20:45, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: sources covering production, controversy and critical appraisal are in my opinion enough for this to be retained. -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 14:47, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Momina Duraid: I’d suggest we redirect this, if not deleted, because it doesn’t meet GNG. Fwiw, it was created by LOUTSOCK (Special:Contributions/154.80.67.71) and later expanded by Nauman335, our acclaimed UPE sock master. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 16:27, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 13:45, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Keep or redirect?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ToadetteEdit (talk) 18:28, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - As per WP:Notability (television), there are sources available on Google search which can be added into the article from reliable sources, making it a notable television show.202.165.250.79 (talk) 15:47, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
ATA: WP:THEREMUSTBESOURCES — Saqib (talk I contribs) 16:03, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not just saying. I actually google it and I found below articles other than the ones included in the article.

1, 2, 3, 4. 202.165.250.79 (talk) 17:52, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Some of the URLs are broken. Please fix them and I’ll assess them. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 17:59, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I can’t access the first two URLs; the links are broken. The other two don’t meet GNG. This one is not a RS, and this one is TRIVIALMENTIONS and without a byline, so I wouldn’t consider it for GNG. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 09:38, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I just went through your talk page, and I feel you are not gonna support the logically stated "Vote in favor" cause you, yourself can Google the title of the page and then decide whether it does meet WP:GNG or not cause apparently there is coverage about the show. Anyways, "Note to the closing admin", consider the search results prior to deciding your outcome as I feel User:Saqib should, rather than putting up an article for WP:Afd, focus on improving them. Peace out ! 202.165.250.70 (talk) 18:43, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I just went through your talk page, and I feel you are not gonna support the logically stated "Vote in favor" Sorry, I don’t quite get it. Can you explain a bit more? you, yourself can Google the title of the page and then decide whether it does meet WP:GNG or no I did a Google search and couldn’t find anything to help establish GNG. That’s why I asked you to provide coverage that you believe meets GNG. The onus is on you to provide that coverage since you voted to keep the page, not on me. I feel User:Saqib should, rather than putting up an article for WP:Afd, focus on improving them. I didn’t nominate this page for deletion. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 05:51, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.