The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was No consensus.—Quarl(talk) 2007-02-08 21:55Z
A note on the nomination, an article being unsourced is a case where deletion may not be necessary. Unsourced claims within the article is not a reason for deletion at all. This artist satisfies WP:MUSIC by having multiple works released through Gotee —siroχo
Strong Keep, does claim notability (less clear from previous current version, but merged back now with an older version). MathmoTalk
Decided to dig around a little, came across this:
In 1994, Knowdaverbs moved to Nashville to link with Gotee Records' hip-hop group, GRITS, as their dancer and hype man. He soon began guest appearances on several of GRITS' songs and videos including "Hopes and Dreams" and "Plagiarism" the latter of which charted to #8 on BET's Rap City's Top 10. His talent caught the eye of Gotee Records CEO, Toby McKeehan, who soon approached Knowdaverbs to record an album.
The video for the title track received a great response with rotation on Fish TV, BET's Lift Every Voice, Jam Zone and Rap City.
Would appear that it does too meet what is required. There is probably a lot more out there that can't be found easily through use of google because this is from pre-internet days (or at least the widespread use of it). MathmoTalk10:26, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Found reviews and news articles on Cross Rhythms[1]. Even ignoring the significant amount of coverage I'd expect there would be offline it would appear that there is still enough to be found online for notability and sourcing to be covered for this. MathmoTalk11:04, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep for the topic, as he has multiple release for Gotee so he satisfies WP:MUSIC, however, the article is currently a copyvio from allmusic.com [2] so must be dealt with apropriately. —siroχo15:44, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.