The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 02:21, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Velibre GmbH (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability has not been established. PanchoS (talk) 12:34, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. sst✈ 14:20, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. sst✈ 14:20, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. sst✈ 14:22, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Setting aside the WP:COI at the article's origin to focus on content and notability, its text veers in many directions, such as how to use a Nespresso machine, but given its title needs to be regarded as being about the firm rather than the product. A German Google search turns up various product reviews, but I am seeing nothing to demonstrate WP:CORPDEPTH notability. AllyD (talk) 08:01, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as longtime troubled article a for seemingly non-notable company, nothing here to suggest convincingly better. SwisterTwister talk 06:58, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.