The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:42, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable list prepared by a network. Never mind that I haven't heard any of these songs, I fail to see how a list without any particular scale of inclusion would warrant an article, especially given the utter lack of sources. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Many otters • One hammer • HELP) 17:29, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The only reason that these programmes ever get made is because they are cheap. Hire a few talking heads, play a load of clips (cheap to buy the rights for these) Bingo! you've got 3 hours of telly, off to the pub, trebles all round.
The audience is rarely told who votes for these things, (because it depends solely on what some low-paid production assistant has cobbled together and is by no means an objective list) or what the criteria for inclusion (sorry DF, but it does mean something) are. Does Wikipedia need an article on any or all of them? I think not. pablohablo. 20:01, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]