The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:48, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User Intent

[edit]


User Intent (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Creator of article removed PROD; seems to be a clear case of attempting to make an unknown term more popular. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 06:56, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Coffee, this is not an unknown term. Please just simply run a google search for "User Intent". You will see. Here is a link to google's result page: https://www.google.com/search?q=user+intent&hl=en&gl=us Thanks. JoseRolles (talk) 07:00, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 07:01, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 07:01, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 07:01, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 07:01, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

When I removed the code at the top, the notice from Wikipedia was that I can remove it if I added a description to the Save Change. Which I did: "User Intent" is a huge topic in the world of SEO (Search Engine Optimization) and SEM (Search Engine Marketing). You can see that there is somewhat outdated content in web search query#Types and it only touches on it a small bit.

Thanks JoseRolles (talk) 07:04, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Some references for this term

Thanks.

JoseRolles (talk) 07:11, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@JoseRolles: From WP:NOTNEO: Some neologisms can be in frequent use, and it may be possible to pull together many facts about a particular term and show evidence of its usage on the Internet or in larger society. To support an article about a particular term or concept, we must cite what reliable secondary sources, such as books and papers, say about the term or concept, not books and papers that use the term. An editor's personal observations and research (e.g. finding blogs, books, and articles that use the term rather than are about the term) are insufficient to support articles on neologisms because this may require analysis and synthesis of primary source material to advance a position, which is explicitly prohibited by the original research policy. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 16:30, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Coffee: See secondary sources below:

Here are some journals and papers (secondary sources) about the term.

203.233.111.21 (talk) 23:41, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Coffee: Book on advertising about user intent

Here is an excerpt from a Cambridge-published book on advertising Understanding Sponsored Search: Core Elements of Keyword Advertising
"The user intent [40, 41, 42] is somewhat unique to Web searching. So, given the importance and application of intent, we cover it here.
What can we learn from underlying intent of a searcher's key terms?
Naturally, different queries often have different underlying needs, and these underlying needs often unduce different types of searcher behavior, from click-through behavior to browsing behavior. For example, empirical studies have noted that broad informational queries (e.g., digital camera) requre more browsing by searchers relative to more focused queries (e.g., find a Nokia camera) [43].
The research into user intent in Web search begins with Broder [40], who proposed three broad user-intent classifications for Web queries: navigational, informational, and transactional. This framework was based on empirical observation, and it has been supported by a string of empirical research in the area of Web searching. For example, Spink and Jansen [44] report that e-commerce-related queries varied from approximately 12 percent to 24 percent using various Web search engine transaction logs. Jansen, Spink, and Pedersen [45] stated that there was a significan use of search engines as a navigation appliance."
Excerpt from Understanding Sponsored Search: Core Elements of Keyword Advertising, Jansen, Jim, Pennsylvania State University. Page 44. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA, July 2011.

JoseRolles (talk) 23:59, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Coffee: An early journal in 2002 that talks about the term

An early journal in 2002 that talks about the term by Broder also used as a reference in web search query Wikipedia article.

JoseRolles (talk) 01:20, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein  14:06, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
More