The result was speedy keep. (non-admin closure) DavidWS (contribs) 21:55, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This article is pretty much unrefenced, POV advertising. The only thing remotely notable about it is that it is old, and age alone does not establish notablility. Also, it is very unencyclopedic. Jonathan321 (talk) 00:51, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]