The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Per WP:SK#1, nomination withdrawn and no outstanding delete !votes. (non-admin closure) — Sam Sailor 19:47, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Upsilon Sigma Phi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Being "oldest" does not make it notable; having notable alumni does not make it notable; having existed under the reign of Ferdinand Marcos does not make it notable. Having been created by a WP:SPA[1] argues against its notability. What would make it notable would be non-trivial discussion of it in reliable independent secondary sources... Which appear not to exist. KDS4444 (talk) 03:07, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:26, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 I withdraw my nomination , as interest level seems to be low. KDS4444 (talk) 07:57, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.