The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:39, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ulubey canyon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

No sources for verifiability despite claims of being "the world’s second longest canyon". Orphaned article with no external or inbound links whatsoever. Google yields little. Flewis(talk) 11:42, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

See also Google News results.--Michig (talk) 12:08, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
See also Google scholar results - the canyon appears to have considerable historical significance.--Michig (talk) 12:11, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.