The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:08, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ultimate NRG

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Also included in this nomination:

Ultimate NRG 2

Non-notable compilation albums. These albums are not original music by an artist, they are simply a collection of songs on one CD; a glorified mixtape. Fails WP:NALBUM and WP:GNG. SnottyWong ^comment 18:26, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete both for utter lack of sources. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 20:45, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep. I've heard of these, and they're definitely not 'glorified mixtapes'. That said, they do need better sources. Esteffect (talk) 21:53, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't believe that "I've heard of these" is a valid notability criterion. If better sources cannot be found, then the albums are, by definition, not notable. SnottyWong ^chat 22:10, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

These are studio albums from the producer Alex K, the albums include his own work.Atkinsonhd (talk) 19:19, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:26, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The clubland albums from [AATW] have a huge following and are top selling dance genre compilation album some of these songs cannot be bought on CD accept for in this form as they never made it past White label statusAtkinsonhd (talk) 19:08, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ILIKEIT SnottyWong ^comment 19:40, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see how that's relevant here, noting something is a "top selling dance genre compilation" isn't case of 'liking it' at all. Yes, it could be with a reference to that effect, but that's not a relevant policy to show in this case - He didn't say they're "good". I grew out of this type of dance music years ago, but I'd still say that they just meet the notability threshold. Esteffect (talk) 20:12, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 16:42, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for lack of reliable secondary sources. Notability unasserted per WP:NALBUMS. Uncle Dick (talk) 16:46, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete being a compilation isn't a problem, compilations are often bestsellers and sometimes hugely influential (i.e. the "Now..." series). No evidence that's the case here though. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 17:00, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as article fails notability criteria for albums. Armbrust ^Talk _Contribs 20:10, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.