The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 20:22, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

USS Clarence E Walsh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

This fictional ship does not establish notability independent of the video game series. Without coverage in reliable third party sources, it is just made up of unnecessary plot summary and original research. TTN (talk) 22:54, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletions. TTN (talk) 22:57, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, pure plot rehash. Nifboy (talk) 23:14, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Plot summary/OR. Not covered in sources independent from the game. Protonk (talk) 05:20, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as original research. If we keep it for some reason at least rename "historical background" to something else! -- Magioladitis (talk) 00:39, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete has no significance, is only a plot and therefor is cruft and it lacks notability. Salavat (talk) 18:32, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.