The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Merge to Tupac Shakur. —Quarl ^(talk) 2007-02-11 01:19Z

Tupac Shakur Tattoos (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

I can't image a reason why this article should be kept. The title speaks for itself. Non-notable at the top.Merging is possible, but in my opinion ii doesn't even deserve a footnote entry Lajbi ^{Holla @ me} 18:12, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per above. Lajbi ^{Holla @ me} 18:14, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete or merge to Tupac Shakur. The person may be notable, but his tattoos aren't. Walton monarchist89 19:42, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge again carefully. This has already been brought to AfD once, and the result was merge. It was merged in its entirety, then cut out entirely again. Looks like some discussion on the talk page for Tupac Shakur as to what of this is appropriate, and then a careful merge of something people can reach a consensus on, is needed. Pinball22 21:37, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge per Pinball22. Mathmo ^Talk 10:20, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.