The result was Delete. Peacent 01:46, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Unimportant person. The only thing notable about her is her birthday. Hence, she is listed at List of living supercentenarians. A list of the oldest people in the world and related statistics is important; however, that doesn't mean they all need an article. --- RockMFR 20:43, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for different reasons. I believe that being 9th-oldest in the world SHOULD be notable in and of itself. However, the practical reality is that we currently are limited by strict Japanese confidentiality laws and a lack of Japanese interest in super-c's (except for first place). Therefore, we are constrained by the situation...there is little information available on this case and placement in the list should be sufficient.
Note this differs from a case in the USA or even Europe, where interest leads to local news coverage and enough extraneous information to warrant an article.
The bottom line: this article should be deleted be it provides no new information.Ryoung122 23:39, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No information that isn't included in the oldest people list. --RandomOrca2 17:01, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]