The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 06:59, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tsk! Tsk! Records (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nominating on behalf for User:DissidentAggressor after an previous AfD on the wrong page (the last AfD that concluded as no consensus due to no participation), whose original rationale is As was noted in the previous AFD, the only refs that can be found are from either Facebook or blogs. IMHO, the previous AFD should have been closed as "no objection", which I agree after searches on GNews and GBooks. 野狼院ひさし u/t/c 00:51, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. lavender|^{(formerly HMSSolent)}|lambast 01:19, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. lavender|^{(formerly HMSSolent)}|lambast 01:20, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: as the guy who screwed up the AFD nomination that Hisashiyarouin un-fouled, submitted and agreed with. The Dissident Aggressor 03:58, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: non-notable record label. Of the three "notable" artists, the best-sourced one does not mention the label at all. 1: Label can not be construed as one of the "more important indie labels" per NMUSIC. 2: Label does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NCORP. 3. There's really no useful information in the article at all. It exist(s/ed). 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 18:30, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Lack of significant coverage. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 01:39, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:01, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete unfortunately as my searches found nothing particularly good so they live to their "independent label" name and I certainly wish I had commented at the first AfD. SwisterTwister talk 06:14, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.