The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Even though a week has passed I'm listing this as SK because the nomination is entirely unfounded in policy (in fact, it fell out of the WP:ATA tree and hit a couple of branches on the way down), and this nominator has a sytemic issue with making nominations that are not soundly policy-based, as well as giving the distinct impression of having been created solely to make said attempts at deletion. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 11:06, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tshegofatso Seakgoe (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

• Delete. Sources are poor and article is not noteworthy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zacleaner (talk • contribs) 29 November 2015‎

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.