The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Melanie Amaro. J04n(talk page) 11:10, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Truly (album)

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

According to Wal-mart the album is supposedly due March 31 (see here) but the reference actually says December 31, 2013. Seems highly unlikely that an album would be listed for sale so much before its release date and evidently the information available about the album is limited. Not notable per WP:NALBUMS. — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 21:04, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:55, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Melanie Amaro. Merging seems the obvious outcome here until there is more to be written about the album. It should be considered more often before bringing articles to AfD. --Michig (talk) 20:46, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep to Truly (album) I don't understand why there is so much need for all this controversy over Melanie Amaro's debut album? If the album is not going to be released in stores till the end of the year then change the date on the page to December 31, 2013 like it says in it's sources. There should be no big deal and argument over this when the sources do indicate that the album will be released. It's not like someone is trying to copyright anything and putting false information or adding article sources that has been reported as spam filters. Just leave it alone! I really don't see any problems here if all that were the case then the article should be deleted but it's not the case!??! User talk:Welcometothenewmillenium 20:29, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran (t • c) 10:56, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.