The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge. Daniel J. Leivick (talk) 02:11, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Trellium-D (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

This article was AFD'd previously and still asserts zero notability through reliable sources, and is just plot repetition. As such, it just repeats information already found in episode articles and should be deleted. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 21:21, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. —• Gene93k (talk) 21:57, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• 'keep, & Expand to include Trellium-A. DGG (talk) 22:45, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why would we add even more unnotable information about fan trivia when there is already an article full of it just waiting to be deleted? Judgesurreal777 (talk) 23:13, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Because its Star Trek. 137.111.143.140 (talk) 05:04, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep The AfD nomination appears inaccurate. The first sentence of the article is not "just plot repetition:" "Trellium-D is a fictional chemical substance from the Star Trek universe, introduced in the series Star Trek: Enterprise." This was not in the plot of Enterprise. Sadly, I'm in the know about that. --Blechnic (talk) 07:26, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge and redirect into Impulse (Star Trek: Enterprise) -- which I have just done, with improvements -- hope that is acceptable, especially as there was no AFD template on the article. There was support for that action in the multiple nom Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mallora as follows, including the present nominator:

Merge and redirect I can agree with merging these into the various lists of Star Trek characters. The articles are mostly about charcters that appear in only a few episodes, or even just one episode, and are of almost no importance to the Star Trek universe let alone our own, real universe. As for Trellium-D, it can be merged into the article on the episode it appeared in, "Impulse" Johnred32 (talk) 04:13, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

I've now proposed that Delphic Expanse be merged into a list of regions, see draft at User:Fayenatic london/List of Star Trek regions of space. Trellium-D could still go into that section, or into "Impulse"; it's significant in other episodes e.g. "Damage" but "Impulse" may be best as that is where its effects were introduced. - Fayenatic (talk) 14:43, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Merge and redirect - Would be really good to do as they are all non -notable stubs on their own. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 20:09, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

It was discussed further at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Star Trek/archive4#Trellium-D and no better suggestion was forthcoming.

I guess I should not now close this AFD but leave that for someone independent. - Fayenatic (talk) 19:18, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

So you hijacked the discussion and did whatever resulted from the input of none? Well, that seems about wiki-right. --Blechnic (talk) 19:24, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I had already done all the other mergers agreed at AFD/Mallora (see Archive 4 again). Because of another merger that I recently offered to do, I remembered that this one was outstanding, so I carried out the merge as previously discussed and apparently agreed. Then, when I checked incoming links, there was a current AFD which had not been notified on the article page! Sorry, I should have explained that. - Fayenatic (talk) 20:24, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.