The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 03:02, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Travel Service (SmartWings) fleet (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unnecessary content fork which artificially conflates information from five small articles about separate (but related) airlines. YSSYguy (talk) 07:07, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete and merge content back into main articles. - Ahunt (talk) 11:02, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete content and depth of coverage was OK in main articles no need to fork and pad out with unencyclopedic content. MilborneOne (talk) 18:37, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, merge encyclopedic content into main article and get rid off the non-encyclopedic stuff (which is unreliably supported by Planespotters).--Jetstreamer ^Talk 16:14, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There is nothing to merge, everything in the article has been copied-and-pasted from one of five other articles. YSSYguy (talk) 21:28, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. Uanfala (talk) 22:53, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as by far nothing at all convincing for its own article. SwisterTwister talk 20:23, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.