The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Anas ^talk? 20:51, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Transitional web applications (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Recently prodded by another editor, prod notice removed so I'm taking this as contested. Reasons for deletion: neologism; notability (no non-WP ghits other than the only reference, which is a blog), and therefore OR. Even the single reference describes the idea as "rambling". No encyclopedic value. andy 22:22, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as obvious neologism, possibly made up one day too. I wish neologisms were speedy-able... Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps)))} 23:34, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete As neo. Can't find anything for it either. --Breno ^talk 12:34, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, neologism. Pavel Vozenilek 15:15, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Undelete, It may be a neologism, but wasn't "podcast" one too when it first came up? Duartegrilo

• No, it wasn't - see here. It was already a well-referenced term in fairly wide use. andy 07:33, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 16:06, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 16:06, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.