The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 11:46, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Transitional shoguns

[edit]

Neologism. Better explainable in the shogun article. Once pointed out by an editor in 2003 in its talk page without any response at all. I have included the "essence" of what the article creator probably wanted to mean there in shogun.--8de8 12:50, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as a neologism. All the useful content in this article has been merged into the "Oda Nobunaga and the Toyotomi" section of the Shogun article. --Richard 07:00, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletions. -- Carom 14:12, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mailer Diablo 12:21, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per above and WP:NEO. That is, unless some reliable sources are added. Rockstar (^T/_C) 17:41, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as neologism. —Disavian (^talk/_contribs) 20:01, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not enough to stand alone, and completely covered by not only the shogun article , but by the articles about these two men. No need to relist a second time. --Bejnar 21:15, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Narrow neology term, contains elements of WP:OR. Information have been merged to Shogun#Oda_Nobunaga_and_the_Toyotomi (AQu01rius  Talk) 22:31, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.