The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Neil ム 10:25, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Toy museum

[edit]

Does not appear to be notable. The Evil Spartan 18:51, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Does not appear to be notable. If page could get a reference for "One of the largest collections" or whatever, it could become notable. •Malinaccier• ^T/C 18:54, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

To be honest, I'm not even sure that would make it notable. Most small stores around the world have some claim to be fame about something. The Evil Spartan 18:56, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unsourced, perhaps unsourceable advertisement. Jakew 19:21, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. GreenJoe 19:58, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No indication of notability.--h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 21:45, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Notable according to this local television station; Notable according to this newspaper; Notable according to Brickworld, an annual gathering of LEGO enthusiasts; Notable according to BrickJournal, a LEGO enthusiast news center... -75.130.90.56 23:05, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Evil Spartan, for someone who wants to remind others about personal attacks, I'd like to know what "evidence" you have for putting a "single-purpose account" tag (aka sock-puppet) onto my Keep vote. -75.130.90.56 21:29, 16 August 2007 (UTC)-[reply]

Keep. PLEASE read the article before making stupid comments! The museum just opened 10 days ago. How can it have the same reputation as a museum that has been around for many years or decades. By the way, it is a museum, not a store. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.166.48.114 (talk • contribs) — 66.166.48.114 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

PLEASE read our guidelines before making personal attacks. The Evil Spartan 19:15, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I will so so right after everybody else read the article. By the way, I was not attacking people. I was only pointing out some nonsense.

Weak Keep - per links above Corpx 04:33, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Needs renaming, considering the existence of Category:Toy museums. Going by Ghits, it's not even the most notable "toy museum" in Ohio. Otherwise, probably (weak) keep per User:75.130.90.56's references, but rewrite article to incorporate them, as it currently reads like an advert. --DeLarge 12:16, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete an article about toy museums, such as the Nuremberg Toy Museum might make at least some sense. But this is just spam for an extremely non-notable guy's personal collection of Legos, including his address(!) and his phone number(!!!) Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 20:10, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom and above.Harlowraman 02:57, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.