The result was speedy deleted by Jclemens under WP:CSD#G3. Non-admin closure. BryanG (talk) 03:53, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I believe this article should be deleted, because I have found no evidence that it meets WP:N. In fact, I have found no evidence that the subject of the article even exists, and I am convinced this is a hoax article as a result. Allventon (talk) 20:40, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]