The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep DavidLeighEllis (talk) 00:32, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Torres (musician) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:MUSIC, WP:BIO, or WP:GNG. Note that I have nominated her album, TORRES (Album). Watch that AFD, if it closes as "MERGE TO ARTIST" and this closes as "DELETE" there will be a problem. Similar notice placed on that AFD. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 19:24, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Tennessee-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:45, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:45, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Native Issue 12 didn't load for me successfully. I think a better source is needed
pigeonsandplanes - what makes this a reliable source?
Lasko - a source defined but not used
Pitchfork - actually a YouTube video, self-published
The Deli - okay, local news coverage not a particularly great source to pass WP:GNG or WP:MUSBIO but does count
abubaker - a source defined but not used
In your speakers - what makes this a reliable source?
Listen Before You Buy - this looks self-published and they'll put up just about any band, notable or otherwise
2 x Nashville Scene - okay
songkick.com - what makes this a reliable source?
2 x Pitchfork reviews - okay
Beats Per Minute, Drowned in Sound, Pretty Much Amazing - what makes these reliable sources?
Album of the year - a list of user reviews. Self published source
Adding that lot up, by my standards, gives you coverage in 5 reliable sources. That's just about enough to tip it into notability, particularly since the odds are that more sources will appear in time (but see WP:TOOSOON and WP:CRYSTAL). Despite what Stomachworm88 claimed above, the article meets none of the "free pass" criteria in WP:MUSBIO, since her album was self-published and has not charted, and her "tours" are not notable enough to be written about in Rolling Stone. On a side note, "Scott decidedly crafted the distinct sound of her debut album" is very much WP:POV, so I've copyedited the article to tone things down a bit. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 08:24, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Exactly how does this reach criteria #4? That's (imho) for people like Daryl Stuermer, who, while never appearing as an official member of Genesis and not playing on their albums, achieved notability by being part of the regular touring line-up. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:21, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • ok maybe this musician does not meet criterion #4, but she still does definitely meet criterion #1, which is the most important criterion. thus this article is not a legitimate candidate for deletion and we must keep. Stomachworm88 (talk) 21:59, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.