The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Metropolitan90 (talk) 03:36, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Toni Pressley[edit]

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Declined speedy deletion on the grounds that the article was the article is not substantively the same as the previous version. While the content may have changed significantly, the subject has not. Ms. Pressley still has not played in a fully pro league, and more importantly has not received significant coverage, meaning the article still fails WP:NSPORT and WP:GNG. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:23, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:25, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 10:27, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Toni Pressley is good enough for Ryazan VDV and Russian Women's Football Championship; she is good enough for a wiki-page. She satisfy GNG.Harvardton (talk) 04:09, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Significant coverage not skill is the relevant factor. The sources listed are all routine, making them insufficient for WP:GNG, and the Russian Championship cannot be reliably sourced as being fully pro, meaning playing in it does not confer notability. All of this was already covered in the last afd, and the subject has not changed significantly since last September. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:54, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:30, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:30, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ms Pressley has received significant news coverage as one of 2 players playing in a foreign leage to be called to play in at the four-nations-tournament at La Manga, Spain. There is currently no fully-professional league in North America for women's soccer. Harvardton (talk) 04:09, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Article needs expansion not deletion. Passes WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO. The fully professional list is incomplete and questionable per multiple discussions available in the archives Hmlarson (talk) 04:07, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J04n(talk page) 23:26, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per GS. No indication of substantial third party sources, so not convinced subject passes GNG. No indication whatsoever in article that subject fulfills either criterion in ANYBIO. Fenix down (talk) 09:38, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Passes WP:GNG. Not convinced the delete votes went looking for coverage, but instead are basing votes on content on page instead of available coverage. A quick search through Google News archives pops up [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. This does not include sources beyond that and does not include a more indepth search of Google results. Convinced by available search results that topic passes WP:GNG. WP:NSPORTS takes a back seat to that. --LauraHale (talk) 19:49, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Article passes WP:GNG criteria, since she has clear notability.--SirEdimon (talk) 22:58, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.