The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) SophisticatedSwampert let's talk about that 01:24, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Tofutti (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

this is a promotion of the company which violates WP:NOTADVERTISING Jonnymoon96 (talk) 21:00, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It's easy to say that, but could we see some sources? Google news search gives a lot of routine and machine-generated stories but not much proper journalistic reporting with meaningful information. The cited article is fine, but it's only one piece. --Colapeninsula (talk) 10:47, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch 00:56, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch 00:56, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch 00:56, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.