The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
STRONG DELETE - I did not nominate this article, I was simply fixing templates when I came across it. This seems autobiographical, cleary very self promotional, and I'm surprised it has been around so long. --Ng.j20:32, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete autobiographical and utterly unencyclopedic. An embarassment for us all that it's been around since last year! Andrew Lenahan - Starblind14:03, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Reads like a promotional flyer. This article has POV problems across the board. Also, the subject does not appear to be very notable. --Cyrus Andiront/c15:43, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.