The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


The result was keep per existence of two valid topics. BD2412 T 01:26, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tina Peters (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

We only have one article on a person by this name: Tina Peters (field hockey). Another Tina Peters is mentioned in 2022 Colorado Secretary of State election, but as there's a clear primary topic the latter article can be connected to the former with a hatnote and without the need for a disambiguation page. I was prepared to await an AfC decision on Draft:Tina Peters (Colorado) (see Talk:Tina Peters#Tina Peters (Colorado)), but as no progress in that direction has been made for a month I think we should delete this unnecessary disambiguation page, and move the hockey player article to the base name, with no prejudice against recreating it if an article on the Colorado politician ever comes into being. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 19:57, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, Arms & Hearts, how much have you heard about the hockey player, vs. about the Colorado county clerk and election denier? I would say it is overwhelmingly the case that the latter is primary usage for the term, so the latter should be moved to Tina Peters and there should be no hatnote from the article directly to the hockey player, but rather there will be a hatnote to the disambiguation page, to be moved to Tina Peters (disambiguation).
FWIW, I edited the draft article and submitted it to AFC. I updated it somewhat, but didn't bother with covering the arrest warrant. There is simply too much going on in the news with her for a single editor to keep up. It needs to be in mainspace, where it will be heavily reviewed and changed.--Doncram (talk) 02:32, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Update: Thank you SWinxy for notifying us about the article about another Tina Peters. I think it is now clear that this article is needed as a disambig page. MrsSnoozyTurtle 22:13, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 18:41, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 20:27, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.