The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Tiger and the Duke. Merged by User:Doomsdayer520 (non-admin closure) CTJF83 chat 02:26, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tiger and the Duke demos

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable demos. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:30, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:48, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and Redirect to Tiger and the Duke. The existence of demo versions of some of the same songs would be of historical interest in the article for the later studio album (assuming the info is verifiable). DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 18:13, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 17:44, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CTJF83 GoUSA 21:17, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - since no one else has voted or commented in last 18 days, I am doing the merge/redirect. This AfD can be closed with that result. DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 20:47, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.