The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:37, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thumbnail gallery post[edit]

Thumbnail gallery post (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I could not find any reliable sourcing for this topic on Google. It seems to be a case of Recentism, have been written in the 00s about a format of Porn website that existed back then, but which ultimately does not achieve the notability required to be included on here. बिनोद थारू (talk) 00:52, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. बिनोद थारू (talk) 00:52, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:42, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: I can't find RS that discuss types of porn websites, let alone this kind. I don't expect this topic to have much mainstream coverage. Delete for lack of sourcing. Oaktree b (talk) 16:44, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I wish the project could run from our past, but as long as embarrassments written by circa 2004 admins like this exist in deep and unsourced detail, I'm afraid we can't. Nate • (chatter) 22:45, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.