The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Coredesat 00:57, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ThreadSpace: Hyperbol (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

This article appears at first glance to have been created for promotional purposes; it describes in loving detail a game that is not yet released, sourcing the details entirely from the websites of the producer and publisher, and states (even in the very first revision) that the material is taken by permission from the developer's website. As to the topic itself, there is absolutely no indication of any encyclopedic notability, or of any third-party awareness of it. Shimgray | talk | 00:01, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete The article's gotten a lot of cleanup and sources added since the nomination, but still fails Wikipedia:Notability by a country mile. The sources are not independent; a reprint of a press release and the developer's website don't count. The sources are not reliable. Darkspots 02:24, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - no signifcant coverage, which isn't surprising as the game is not yet released. No reliable references. -- Whpq 13:42, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom and Darkspots. ---Charles 21:30, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.