- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. North America1000 12:01, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Thomaz Ransmyr (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The article has already been proposed for deletion three times:
- 6 March 2011
- 3 April 2016
- "Both this and the Swedish Wiki have no better convincing signs of satisfying the applicable notability and my searches noticeably found nothing better at all; the current sourcing here is also not convincingly enough."
- 11 May 2022:
- "Poorly sourced articles to non-independent websites that has been tagged for 9 years for lack of citations."
No sufficient improvements have been made since. For example, its references still "do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources".
After more than a decade of very basic problems, as pointed out by several users during this time, it does not seem likely that they will ever be resolved. Caput Deleo (talk) 10:47, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- I couldn't find the above mentioned Swedish Wiki article, because it has been deleted. Four times. Caput Deleo (talk) 10:56, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- It has also been considered to be worth keeping. Three times. 78.76.89.147 (talk) 21:44, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete deleted from svwiki once again last year (a language version with generally a lower notability treshold). Limited coverage in local press. Insufficient with respect to GNG. Draken Bowser (talk) 09:10, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- It has also been considered to be worth keeping. Three times. Links were to nation wide articles, international discography and filming in Sweden and the US. Seems the info was not correctly checked before deletion. 78.76.89.147 (talk) 21:45, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- It has also been considered to be worth keeping. Three times. Links were to nation wide articles, international discography and filming in Sweden and the US. Seems the info was not correctly checked before deletion. 78.76.89.147 (talk) 21:46, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Please do not post the same thing multiple times. This page is about the enwiki article. If this subject is of personal interest to you, please consider not engaging any further, here or elsewhere. Caput Deleo (talk) 20:58, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I am not finding any RS on the biographical information presented. Most of the items listed under "references" are not RS, or not relevant. I do not see away to bring this article up to WP standards fro a living person. WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 20:57, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.