This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2010 February 26. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
The result was delete. Sandstein 17:15, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:((subst:spa|username)) ; suspected canvassed users: ((subst:canvassed|username)) ; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: ((subst:csm|username)) or ((subst:csp|username)) . |
Non-notable priest. Practically all references document trivial aspects of his career. Original editor's name indicates auto-biography. VG ☎ 20:01, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
--Shijualex (talk) 04:53, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The QDOS profile of Fr. Thomas Kuzhinapurath shows that he is having 11346th rank of 67104 profiles. Ref.[2].Simon Cheakkanal (talk) 12:15, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The official website of the Syro-Malnkara Catholic Church praises Fr. Thomas Kuzhinapurath's book Salvific Law.Ref. [3].Simon Cheakkanal (talk) 14:01, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
And Salvific Law (M.S. Publications, Trivandrum, 2008) was reviewed by:
The equal representation from different communities in responding to a single article looks interesting. Simon Cheakkanal (talk) 12:04, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Massive self-promoting delete - this is one of the most blatant self-promotions that I have seen on Wikipedia. He wrote his autobiography (those who have been invited here by Mr. Kuzhinapurath or other members of his church, please note WP:AUTO). Remove all sources connected to him, either directly or indirectly, and there would be nothing left to show that he would be notable under WP:BIO. To meet the notability bar, there must be something from reliable sources (as Wikipedia defines the term) to verify his notability... and I must add that the reliable sources must be clearly without connection with him or his church. Even then, autobiographies tend to be hastily deleted a Wikipedia as the author of an autobiography has a conflict of interest. B.Wind (talk) 04:51, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]