The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 21:22, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas Kronschnable[edit]

AfDs for this article:

Articles for deletion/Thomas Kronschnable (2nd nomination)

Subject appears to be notable only for being shot; WP:BLP1E (although as he's dead, I'm not sure if BLP applies, even though he was alive at the moment he got shot). There's also WP:NOTMEMORIAL and it seems a bit propaganda-ish ("Propaganda often presents facts selectively (thus lying by omission) to encourage a particular synthesis, or gives loaded messages in order to produce an emotional rather than rational response to the information presented") so WP:NOTADVERTISING, too. While it may be a tragedy, it's not notable enough for Wikipedia. Article has just come off an AfD, but the closing admin said he had no objection to an immediate re-opening, as long as each article was nommed individually. I should also add that I created the article. Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 07:17, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The creator of the article has determined that the subject is not independently notable, and I agree. Given that he died some 92 years ago, it seems unlikely that any better sources will materialize. Xymmax ^{So let it be written} _{So let it be done} 10:53, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - trivial coverage. PhilKnight (talk) 13:56, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:BLP1E and WP:NOTMEMORIAL. Madcoverboy (talk) 18:50, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.