The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. WilyD 08:35, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thollem McDonas (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This BLP makes some pretty big claims, such as comparing the subject's influence in the experimental music scene to people like John Cage. But the sources provided for this extensive profile of him are very weak, and do not seem to meet the basic requirements of reliability set down in WP:BIO. Steven Walling • talk 22:38, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:31, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep I agree with the "big claims" comment. I've removed the offending sentence. There is a significant article on McDonas in Signal to Noise (Spring 2011), titled "Gone Beyond Reason." that does compare the artist to Cecil Taylor and George Antheil. Signal to Noise, the Metro Newspaper (Metroactive) and San Francisco Classical Voice are serious publications with dedicated editorial staff that should meet the standards of reliability from WP:BIO and notability from WP:MUSIC. --Kmorris1077 (talk) 06:38, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Probable keep The MetroActive and San Francisco Classical Voice articles are both good, in-depth coverage. I've not read the Signal to Noise article, but it's also a reliable source, and there's more coverage from local press in the article, as well as on Nexis: Megan Gloss, "concert preview Thollem's Everywhere Quintet", Telegraph Herald (Dubuque, IA), August 3, 2012 C, p. 9 2pp. This is a niche field but I think there's overall enough coverage to meet general notability guidelines. --Colapeninsula (talk) 09:47, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.