The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Variations of purple. (non-admin closure) Rcsprinter (talk) 20:49, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thistle (color) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Just another not-notable, poorly-sourced (only source is a dictionary) article on a color that is basically a dictionary definition. It's similar to this AfD nominee and the most of the other articles linked in that AfD. This one happens to be a X11 color, but it should stand for AfD based on its own notability- and if it isn't individually notable then it should just be part of the X11 colors article. Slon02 (talk) 23:53, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Slon02 (talk) 23:53, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • You still haven't pointed out what makes this specific color satisfy the notability requirements for inclusion on Wikipedia. Is there significant coverage of this specific color- in detail- that can satisfy WP:GNG? If there is, it can have a separate article. If not, then it can't and should remain part of the X11 article.--Slon02 (talk) 20:31, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.